The case of Denis Lisov, whose three daughters were taken away by the Swedish authorities and given to a Muslim foster family, once again reminds us that the destruction of the traditional family is one of the fundamental prerequisites for the success of left-wing social engineering, which aims to create a “new man”.
Lisov’s daughters were given to a family of Lebanese refugees after the Russian’s wife fell ill and the father allegedly was unable to cope with bringing up his children. The practicing Russian Orthodox believer kidnapped his children and asked for asylum in Poland. The Swedish authorities sent Mohammed A., a member of the foster family, after Lisov to take the children back and bring them to Sweden. Fortunately, the plan failed. Why fortunately? – The younger daughters didn't understand what was happening. The oldest daughter said that it was hard for her to get used to the lifestyle of this family. I learnt that she found it very difficult to follow their instructions. The situation was also challenging when she was ill or experienced other problems. She was unable to get used to this harsh environment – Lisov testified in a Polish court.
A new secular custom
It seems to be the new custom for the most progressive countries, such as Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Belgium and the whole of Scandinavia, to remove children from mostly white traditional families and hand them over to gay couples, refugees from the Middle East or “patchwork” families. There are no known cases of children being taken away from Muslims and given to deeply believing Christians. There have also been no cases where the offspring of Hassidic Jews, who usually have large families, were taken away to be raised by Muslims. What is the source of this family-focused phobia? Why do the German Jugendamt, Norway’s Barnevernet or Swedish social services cause panic among parents who are bringing up their children in an ordinary way? Revolutionaries who use social engineering claim that the conditions of social life have changed, which necessitates a different arrangement of relations between the state and the family. – Times are changing, so the family institution must also adapt to the requirements of modernity, so that it is not an area where women are oppressed, and the sexual rights of children are violated – explain the progressives. The truth is that the plans for constructing a left-wing utopia are gaining momentum, and the European dignitaries from the “generation of 68” believe that the Ventotene Manifesto is closer than ever to realisation, so they cannot allow children so effectively indoctrinated at school and through modern culture to return to old concepts and “patriarchal” relationships in the family home.
Sovereignty of parental responsibility
In such a precisely outlined ideological project, which the Europeans have been administered for decades, the state cannot afford to have individual centres of power, even if they are centres of parental responsibility. The jealous insistence on adapting to the system is characteristic of any totalitarian power, even one which, as is now the case in the EU, is introduced while wearing kid gloves. Family as part of the plan for a global cultural revolution cannot be left outside state control. Currently, in order to carry out the gender revolution “a global cultural regulation is necessary and mandatory” says Marguerite A. Peeters, a well-known researcher of gender ideology. Here, the battle is about the sovereignty of the family. This is because sovereignty is not only about the nation and its external relations, but it also applies to the independence of parental responsibility from state power. Today, the Christian family must fight for sovereignty on two levels: external and internal. The first is the need to make parental responsibility independent from universalist ideological systems, such as global gender culture, UN recommendations to governments in this area and ideas of EU communists. The second level is the independence of parental authority from the state. This is about factual independence, instead of legal independence. In the above-mentioned Scandinavian countries or in Germany, parents have legal authority over their offspring, but they lack factual authority. This is because the state completely took control over the upbringing and soul of the children.
Parents are de facto treated as state officials implementing an official educational program imposed from above. Any deviation from the norm results in interventions made by other officials – their supervisors representing educational facilities. The rule of the PO-PSL coalition saw the beginning of the taking of children away from families with numerous children due to alleged “poverty”. Since the “Law and Justice” party came into power, this trend has been halted, although it is yet to disappear completely.
Children to the orphanage
The issue keeps on coming back like a boomerang and in a slightly altered form. When after World War II the communists in Poland introduced a new totalitarian regime, one of the first victims was to be the family itself. “So what is behind the current noise, shouting and passionate cries surrounding the family? Almost any vagrant opens its doors and directs strange and frantic words into the quiet of the home: ≪The family does not belong to God – it belongs to the state!≫, Yours should be a civil marriage! ≫, ≪You should not give yourself to God!≫, ≪Your vows are severable!≫, ≪Give your children away to the state, the municipality – it doesn’t matter whom! These children are not yours! You gave them life? You are only state officials!≫ [...] This is the work of the pagan spirit!” – wrote anxious Father Stefan Wyszyński. – This state of affairs, which we now have in Europe and in Western civilisations, is a concrete result of a revolution which has already swept through institutions and Western societies and destroyed the political class. The family, the Church, and patriotism are currently the target of a revolutionary attack. Its essence is to break down every bond, every identity, to blur the boundaries between men and women, children and adults, humans and animals. This has all progressed too far – if we look at American films, so-called “time fillers”, it’s apparent that a normal family is the exception. They usually depict single mothers raising a child on their own” – explains Robert Tekieli, a journalist and an expert in sects in an interview with “Tygodnik Solidarność”. The plans of the Illuminati and revelations in Fatima testify to the importance of the family as an obstacle to the heralds of the global revolution. The Illuminati, a secret society founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, has selected five main points to enable the establishment of the New World Order. It is the destruction of existing governments, the liquidation of patriotic attitudes, the liquidation of private property, the liquidation of the right to inherit property, the liquidation of the family as a basic human cell and the introduction of group education of children by the state and the destruction of all religion. And although today the Illuminati do not exist as a single centre of authority, the techniques of psychomanipulation developed by them and the above points continue to be used, amongst others, by Masonic lodges.
Sounds like the fairy tale about the iron wolf? In 2014, Lucien Greaves, a spokesman for the Satanic Temple in the United States, admitted in an interview for “Detroit Metro Times” that “homosexual marriages” are their “sacrament”, and abortion is a high priority for their faith. – Restricting abortion violates our satanic religious beliefs” added Greaves, a Harvard graduate wearing a well-cut suit. Karl Marx also stated that abortion was a point which the revolution would never give up on.
Despite the fact that the liquidation of private property was not successful, the revolutionaries are not giving up, and although it may seem unlikely to us in Poland, in western Europe the breakdown of the family is already a fact. There are less and less normal families in the West, even in such traditionally Catholic countries like Spain or Italy. What is left of the traditional family institution are mere leftovers. If the French remaining in a permanent state of marriage have more than three kids, everyone believes them to be “catho” – deeply-believing “Catholics”.
Fatima and family
Sister Lucia, a direct witness to the Marian apparitions in Fatima, wrote a moving letter to Cardinal Carlo Caffarra before she died, telling him about the great battle for the family institution. When Pope John Paul II commissioned him with the preparation of a project for the establishment of the Pontifical Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family, the Cardinal wrote a letter to Sister Lucia asking for her prayers. – In an inexplicable way, because I did not expect an answer, since I only asked for her prayers, I received a long letter with her signature, which is now kept in the archives of the Institute.
The letter contains the following words: “A time will come when the decisive battle between the kingdom of Christ and Satan will be over marriage and the family. And those who will work for the good of the family will experience persecution and tribulation.” She then added: “But do not be afraid, because Our Lady has already crushed his head.” – Cardinal explained. Pope John Paul II, deeply moved by the message from Fatima, established as many as three institutions serving the family. On 13 May 1981, on the day of the assassination attempt on his life, the Pope established the Pontifical Council for the Family. In 1982, the Pope established the Pontifical Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family, with branches in Washington, Mexico and Valencia. In 1994, the Pontifical Academy for Life was established, comprising mainly lay people. Pope John Paul II was very keen on providing diocesan pastoral care for families. During his pilgrimages, he met with families having many children. In his Letter to Families “Gratissimam sane”, he wrote: “Among these many paths [of the Church], the family is the first and the most important. It is a path common to all, yet one which is particular, unique and unrepeatable, just as every individual is unrepeatable; it is a path from which man cannot withdraw.” The family was a pastoral priority for Pope John Paul II. Asked once, how he wished to be remembered by future generations, he answered: “I’d like to be called the Pope of the Family.” An optimistic side to all this is that without such a fundamental institution of collective coexistence as the family, no state, even a totalitarian one, can function. Many have already tried and quickly retreated. French Jacobins wanted to educate citizens for the good of the state without the help of parents, the Bolsheviks at the start promoted free sex and the raising of children in communes, and so did the Third Reich and Mao in China. Without a family, chaos quickly took over these nations.
Families shape citizens
“Family gives society the greatest gifts without which it could not exist. Family educates its children and teaches them social interaction. Family enables its children not only to live in a physical sense, but also to live within society. Family introduces us to moral and social concepts. It also instills the soul with a civic sense of law and order, and it does so through love, rather than by force and violence. Without the wardship of society, without state budgets, family bears the entire burden of providing for and bringing up children, and enabling them to live independently. What a citizen brings from its family, he brings to national and state life. The end of the family – is the downfall of society” – wrote Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński in his book “Love and Social Justice”. A healthy family shapes the virtues of patriotism, self-discipline, honesty, industriousness, common sense – all which is later taken advantage of by the state. But this kind of upbringing is never neutral ideologically. Besides, there is no such thing as neutral upbringing. Secular upbringing is a conscious and intentional anti-religious attitude which delivers into adult life those “who do not care about their ancestors and who will not take care of any of their successors and who will abandon their elderly parents” – as Richard M. Weaver once wrote.
Jakub Pacan
Tekst ukazał się w Tygodniku Solidarność nr 17